CaseyGerry is investigating a security breach that has put the sensitive information of individuals at risk.
In January of 2021, Metromile, a San Francisco-based car insurance startup discovered a cybersecurity breach in which a software bug was planted on the company’s quote query web page.
DID YOU RECEIVE NOTICE OF A DATA BREACH FROM A2Z DIAGNOSTICS AND SUFFERED FRAUD AS A RESULT?
CaseyGerry is investigating a data security incident reported by A2Z Diagnostics (A2Z), a lab in New Jersey performing specialized diagnostic testing.
In California, if you lend your car to someone you have a duty to “make a reasonable effort or inquiry to determine whether the prospective driver possesses a valid driver’s license before allowing” that person to drive your car.
CaseyGerry is investigating a data breach reported by Renaissance Life & Health Insurance Company of America. Renaissance reported that the security incident was experienced by their third-party vendor, Secure Administrative Solutions LLC (SAS) who alerted them to it on June 1, 2021.
Johnson & Johnson has issued a recall for four Neutrogena® sunscreen products and one Aveeno® sunscreen product for containing the carcinogen benzene. All recalled products are aerosol sunscreen products.
In a press release issued by Johnson & Johnson, benzene is not an ingredient in Johnson & Johnson products and the company is investigating its presence in the recalled sunscreens.
Transform SR Holding Management LLC also known as Transformco has filed a notice of data breach with the California State Office of the Attorney General. The breach may have compromised the sensitive data of Transformco employees.
CaseyGerry is investigating a data security incident reported by Florida Heart Associates (FHA), a health care service provider specializing in cardiac diseases.
According to the notice of breach on the company website, FHA became aware of unusual activity on the company network.
There are many reasons a Trial Court may not allow attorneys to present evidence to Jurors—perhaps because it’s not relevant, because there’s no foundation, because it’s too prejudicial given the case.
